His work has been used by brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon. This may seem like a drawback, but in reality subject tracking performance remains quite high when Series III Extenders are used with IS II lenses. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. So there you have it a quick guide on how to use Canons 1.4x extenders! 7D gripped XTI gripped a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. 2x Extender: II vs III for my setup? Im sure there will be differences in other parts of the frame as well but if you want to pixel peep every little bit then head on over to The Digital Picture where Brian has all that stuff. Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. IMG2 = new Image(604, 404) . In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. What can I purchase that will not affect sharpness or auto focus speed? (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. Take these for what you will. This is something I'm considering to pair with a future R5 or R6 and my current Canon 100-400mm II, if that makes a difference. That means they wont work with any of Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF. Heres a full list of compatible lenses for each Canon 2x extender: I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. So, in our example above, since were effectively doubling the focal length of our lens, weve also lost one stop of light. The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that:- For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal- For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II.Can anyone with experience with these extenders weigh in? What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience. IMG3.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender.jpg' But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? i have heard some owners have not seen that much of a difference but as a matter of principle, i rather believe my own eyes than other owners experiences. . I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. Using an extender also reduces the amount of light coming into the camera by one f-stop. Let's take a look at the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted on a camera body. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. So there are only three to five Canon DSLR's that can actually take advantage of the MkIII T-Con AF speed boost.As for EOS R mirror-less? 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. This means that youll need to use faster shutter speeds or open up your aperture accordingly if you want to maintain the same exposure as without the extender attached. -EF 75-300mm f/4-.5-.6III USM I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad This for me is more impressive. If you are tracking birds in flight, fast sports action at relatively short distances or shooting low contrast subjects in low light, expect a noticeable AF performance decrease. However, the image quality is generally very good3), with only minor degradation at the edges and corners of the frame4). I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. Just before I left for the trip I picked up both the 1.4x and 2x MKIII extenders and I took them with me, along with my MKIIs to get a feel for them. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens The Mark III also has much less CA (although when shooting RAW lots of CA can be fixed up anyway, if not quite entirely). The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens IMG1 = new Image(604, 404) IMG8 = new Image(604, 404) Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. Solution. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. EF 300mmf/2..8 L USM I & II The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. In essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed. Canon TS-E 45mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. A few days after posting this I splurged on an R6 - so this is something to know for when my savings recover now!The information here been invaluable though. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the I'll let you decide which ones are . The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. document[imgDocID].src = eval(imgObjName + '.src'); The AF speed again seemed to be about on par with the previous version and at wider apertures this MKIII 2x still took a heavy toll on the IQ of the images. You always have to give something to gain something. We hope you find this chart helpful! The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. Another thing to keep in mind is that your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender attached. Great link, thanks! The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a 2x becomes a 140-400mm f/8 lens. Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2X II for the price of either III . How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? But theres more to it than just focal length. So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' Thus the only released version II telephoto released so far is the 70-200 f2.8 IS II, and thats often what the version II Vs III TCs were tested with. IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Photo Lens: Yes On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. Entdecke Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Telekonverter - fast neuwertig - #104 in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). . Even at F/4 IQ is very good.IQ with Extender 2xIII is affected. It really depends on lens . I think if you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III . IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. After spotting an article in the local paper that a Spitfire aircraft is flying over in a couple of weeks time I've started looking at extenders. If I bought one today, the Mark III. Simply as an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] And, that's pretty much it. The 1.4x III adds some barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS A teleconverter is an optical device that increase the effective focal length of a camera lens. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached DSLR cameras will continue to calculate auto exposures properly when used with Canon Extenders. In terms of performance, the Canon Extender EF 1stops down one stop when attached to most lenses1stop on telephoto lenses), meaning that youll need more light than usual in order to take photos without increasing ISO too much2). In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens. Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Lens Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens on a --. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. It really depends on your needs. Particularly in my winter sports work, contrast of the snow is important to maintain. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. -Image circle size compatibility information EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . I have a 1dxii and a 400mm 5.6L. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. Capture One is a, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for Nikon cameras, the 17-55 or the 16-80. If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. The most recent, high performance camera bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point. To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. IMG2.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender.jpg' Canon's Rudy Winston completes this story: "Because AF systems are essentially computer-controlled to read and react to focus distance changes, the information must be modified so that the focusing movement (or sensitivity) compensates for the added presence of the extender. Extender 2x Mk II vs. 2x Mk III. -EF 50mm f/.0 Macro Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens Always check the Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool for the most update-to-date compatibility specs. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. Canon EF 2x II Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera l. $187.11 + $9.72 shipping. an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. I have no experience with either 2.0 Extender. In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). Each row below the image represents either the bare lens or the lens with the specified extender mounted behind it. Well, never fear! Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop Attempting to mount a Canon extender on these same non-compatible lenses can damage the lens due to contact being made with the rear lens element. Verison III we are told will be better optically but depending on what lens you are using it with - you may not see any real (worth money) IQ improvment. Not an expert but I asked the same question a couple of years ago.the II is well worth buying over the Ihandled AF better etc. So if youre looking for a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the Canon 1.4 Extender III is definitely worth considering. I wrote about the MII 2x extender here before, so you might want to take a quick look at that for a couple of samples as well. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results Thanks. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. The III's new color matches Canon's latest white L lenses. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS For some photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. While some third party extenders *may* work properly with Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses, they probably will not report the reduction in aperture. Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Its well-made, its easy to use, and its very affordable. He's probably planning to use it with his 70-200. Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . Note though that this is some beautiful light I am shooting in! Diameter x Length, Weight The obverse is not true. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. Another factor to consider is image quality. The lens release button on the MKIIIs is also larger than on the previous version and it feels a lot nicer under the thumb in operation. About Canon Extender See all 261 reviews Great, works great with 70-200 2.8 IS II By sb Also have 1.4X I, the 2X III is definitely worth having. This Canon Extender 2x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. Add the Canon EF 2x III Extender to the setup for a 360mm 2:1 (2x) Macro lens. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. And, thats pretty much it. I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. 0 ~ 5 . For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a A great lens will typically produce the best image quality when used with the 2x and This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. 1st it's a hobby Of course, to get an extender at all is the first decision to make. The latest versions for DSLRs are the Extender EF 1.4x Mark III and the Extender EF 2x Mark III. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established.